Guidelines for voluntary validation of WEST Bronze Archives Best Practices:
...
022 ISSN if missing
copy from bib record
022 \\ 1047-3157
035 OCLC, if missing
copy from bib record
035 \\ (OCoLC)20665052
583 field with committed to retain
583 1\ Committed to retain|c20221122|d20351231|fWEST|fWEST Bronze|uhttps://www.cdlib.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/WESTProgramStatement.pdf
For the few where we checked physical holdings: 583 field with completeness reviewed to volume-level.
583 1\ completeness reviewed|c20200630|fWEST|fWEST Bronze|ivolume-level
852 field: for newer Holdings Records that are lacking the a, b, & c, we will add our OCLC library code and sub-location in subfield a and b, in front of the call number (using UUSA in b for OCLC compatibility):
852 01 UUS|bUUSA|hTJ3|i.A57
866 (we also can update to the NISO holdings standard of 853/863 if time permits)
...
Click Record; Shared Print Commitment; Add?
...
then I hit Save. Hurray?
Okay for some reason, it thinks I’m adding an identical call number, just click Save again, and then…
...
Okay. That’s the procedure.
But horrors. There , there had better be a way to make the screen …. less hugely glaringly horrifically … WHITE? Gah. Or I’m going to stay on Browser forever.
In OCLC LHR, check these fields:
...
Leader Encoding Level = 3
...
007 = t a
...
008 receipt or acquisition (usually) = 5 (not currently received) or 4 (currently received)
retention policy =8reproduction policy =a(will reproduce)
...
Make sure 853/863 show the most current holdings (edit to match Sierra’s holdings)
...
If holdings are in field 866, can update to 853/863, if time (do make sure holdings are up to date)
...
Add 583 field formatted according to WEST documentation:
1st indicator =1(public note)Committed to retain $c 20221122 $d 20351231 $f WEST $f WEST Bronze $uhttps://www.cdlib.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/WESTProgramStatement.pdf
...
and loudly… WHITE? with teeny tiny grey text oh so lovely
(I’m staying on OCLC Browser forever.)
WEST’s MARC field charts (a selection):
...